| # Contributing to rdma-core | |
| rdma-core is a userspace project for a Linux kernel interface and follows many | |
| of the same expectations as contributing to the Linux kernel: | |
| - One change per patch | |
| Carefully describe your change in the commit message and break up work into | |
| appropriate reviewable commits. | |
| Refer to [Linux Kernel Submitting Patches](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst) | |
| for general information. | |
| - Developer Certificate of Origin 'Signed-off-by' lines | |
| Include a Signed-off-by line to indicate your submission is suitable | |
| licensed and you have the legal authority to make this submission | |
| and accept the [DCO](#developers-certificate-of-origin-11) | |
| - Broadly follow the [Linux Kernel coding style](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) | |
| As in the Linux Kernel, commits that are fixing bugs should be marked with a | |
| Fixes: line to help backporting. | |
| Test your change locally before submitting it, you can use 'buildlib/cbuild' | |
| to run the CI process locally and ensure your code meets the mechanical | |
| expectations before sending the PR. | |
| # Using GitHub | |
| Changes to rdma-core should be delivered via [GitHub Pull Request](https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests) | |
| to the [rdma-core](https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core) project. | |
| Each pull request should have a descriptive title and "cover letter" summary | |
| indicating what commits are present. | |
| A brief summary of the required steps: | |
| - Create a github account for yourself | |
| - [Clone](https://docs.github.com/en/github/creating-cloning-and-archiving-repositories/cloning-a-repository-from-github/cloning-a-repository) | |
| the [rdma-core](https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core) project in GitHub | |
| - Setup a local clone of your repository using 'git clone'. | |
| - Ensure your local branch is updated to the tip of rdma-core | |
| - Make your change. Form the commits and ensure they are correct | |
| - Push to your local git repository to your GitHub on a dedicated branch. | |
| - Using the GitHub GUI make a Pull Request from the dedicated branch to | |
| rdma-core | |
| ## Making Revisions | |
| If changes are required they should be integrated into the commits and the | |
| pull request updated via force push to your branch. As a policy rdma-core | |
| wishes to have clean commit objects. As a courtesy to others describe the | |
| changes you made in a Pull Request comment and consider to include a | |
| before/after diff in that note. | |
| Do not close/open additional pull requests for the same topic. | |
| ## Continuous Integration | |
| rdma-core performs a matrix of compile tests on each Pull Request. This is to | |
| ensure the project continues to be buildable on the wide range of supported | |
| distributions and compilers. These tests include some "static analysis" passes | |
| that are designed to weed out bugs. | |
| Serious errors will result in a red X in the PR and will need to be corrected. | |
| Less serious errors, including checkpatch related, will show up with a green | |
| check but it is necessary to check the details to see that everything is | |
| appropriate. checkpatch is an informative tool, not all of its feedback is | |
| appropriate to fix. | |
| A build similar to AZP can be run locally using docker and the | |
| 'buildlib/cbuild' script. | |
| ```sh | |
| $ buildlib/cbuild build-images azp | |
| $ buildlib/cbuild pkg azp | |
| ``` | |
| ## Coordinating with Kernel Changes | |
| Some changes consume a new uAPI that needs to be added to the kernel. Adding a | |
| new rdma uAPI requires kernel and user changes that must be presented together | |
| for review. | |
| - Prepare the kernel patches and rdma-core patches together. Test everything | |
| - Send the rdma-core patches as a PR to GitHub and possibly the mailing list | |
| - Send the kernel patches to linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org. Refer to the matching | |
| GitHub PR in the cover letter by URL | |
| - The GitHub PR will be marked with a 'needs-kernel-patch' tag and will not | |
| advance until the kernel component is merged. | |
| Keeping the kernel include/uapi header files in sync requires some special | |
| actions. The first commit in the series should synchronize the kernel headers | |
| copies in rdma-core with the proposed new kernel-headers that this change | |
| requires. This commit is created with the script: | |
| ```sh | |
| $ kernel-headers/update ~/linux.git HEAD --not-final | |
| ``` | |
| It will generate a new commit in the rdma-core.git that properly copies the | |
| kernel headers from a kernel git tree. The --not-final should be used until | |
| official, final, commits are available in the canonical [git | |
| tree](http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git) | |
| This will allow the CI to run and the patches to be reviewed. | |
| Once the kernel commits are applied a final git rebase should be used to | |
| revise the kernel-headers commit: | |
| ```sh | |
| $ kernel-headers/update ~/linux.git <commit ID> --amend | |
| ``` | |
| The updated commits should be force pushed to GitHub. | |
| Newer kernels should always work with older rdma-core and newer rdma-core | |
| should always work with older kernels. Changes forcing the simultaneous | |
| upgrade of the kernel and rdma-core are forbidden. | |
| # Participating in the Mailing List | |
| Patches of general interest should be sent to the mailing list | |
| linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org for detailed discussion. In particular patches that | |
| modify any of the ELF versioned symbols or external programming API should be | |
| sent to the mailing list. | |
| While all patches must have a GitHub Pull Request created, minor patches can | |
| skip the mailing list process. | |
| # Making a new library API | |
| All new library APIs that can be called externally from rdma-core require a | |
| man page describe the API and must be sent to the mailing list for review. | |
| This includes device specific "dv" APIs. | |
| Breaking the ABI of any exported symbol is forbidden. | |
| # Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1 | |
| By making a contribution to this project, I certify that: | |
| (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I | |
| have the right to submit it under the open source license | |
| indicated in the file; or | |
| (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best | |
| of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source | |
| license and I have the right under that license to submit that | |
| work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part | |
| by me, under the same open source license (unless I am | |
| permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated | |
| in the file; or | |
| (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other | |
| person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified | |
| it. | |
| (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution | |
| are public and that a record of the contribution (including all | |
| personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is | |
| maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with | |
| this project or the open source license(s) involved. | |
| then you just add a line saying: | |
| Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org> | |
| using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.) | |
| This will be done for you automatically if you use ``git commit -s``. | |
| Reverts should also include "Signed-off-by". ``git revert -s`` does that | |
| for you. |