| optimization Tips (for libavcodec): | |
| =================================== | |
| What to optimize: | |
| ----------------- | |
| If you plan to do non-x86 architecture specific optimizations (SIMD normally), | |
| then take a look in the x86/ directory, as most important functions are | |
| already optimized for MMX. | |
| If you want to do x86 optimizations then you can either try to fine-tune the | |
| stuff in the x86 directory or find some other functions in the C source to | |
| optimize, but there aren't many left. | |
| Understanding these overoptimized functions: | |
| -------------------------------------------- | |
| As many functions tend to be a bit difficult to understand because | |
| of optimizations, it can be hard to optimize them further, or write | |
| architecture-specific versions. It is recommended to look at older | |
| revisions of the interesting files (web frontends for the various FFmpeg | |
| branches are listed at http://ffmpeg.org/download.html). | |
| Alternatively, look into the other architecture-specific versions in | |
| the x86/, ppc/, alpha/ subdirectories. Even if you don't exactly | |
| comprehend the instructions, it could help understanding the functions | |
| and how they can be optimized. | |
| NOTE: If you still don't understand some function, ask at our mailing list!!! | |
| (http://lists.ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel) | |
| When is an optimization justified? | |
| ---------------------------------- | |
| Normally, clean and simple optimizations for widely used codecs are | |
| justified even if they only achieve an overall speedup of 0.1%. These | |
| speedups accumulate and can make a big difference after awhile. Also, if | |
| none of the following factors get worse due to an optimization -- speed, | |
| binary code size, source size, source readability -- and at least one | |
| factor improves, then an optimization is always a good idea even if the | |
| overall gain is less than 0.1%. For obscure codecs that are not often | |
| used, the goal is more toward keeping the code clean, small, and | |
| readable instead of making it 1% faster. | |
| WTF is that function good for ....: | |
| ----------------------------------- | |
| The primary purpose of this list is to avoid wasting time optimizing functions | |
| which are rarely used. | |
| put(_no_rnd)_pixels{,_x2,_y2,_xy2} | |
| Used in motion compensation (en/decoding). | |
| avg_pixels{,_x2,_y2,_xy2} | |
| Used in motion compensation of B-frames. | |
| These are less important than the put*pixels functions. | |
| avg_no_rnd_pixels* | |
| unused | |
| pix_abs16x16{,_x2,_y2,_xy2} | |
| Used in motion estimation (encoding) with SAD. | |
| pix_abs8x8{,_x2,_y2,_xy2} | |
| Used in motion estimation (encoding) with SAD of MPEG-4 4MV only. | |
| These are less important than the pix_abs16x16* functions. | |
| put_mspel8_mc* / wmv2_mspel8* | |
| Used only in WMV2. | |
| it is not recommended that you waste your time with these, as WMV2 | |
| is an ugly and relatively useless codec. | |
| mpeg4_qpel* / *qpel_mc* | |
| Used in MPEG-4 qpel motion compensation (encoding & decoding). | |
| The qpel8 functions are used only for 4mv, | |
| the avg_* functions are used only for B-frames. | |
| Optimizing them should have a significant impact on qpel | |
| encoding & decoding. | |
| qpel{8,16}_mc??_old_c / *pixels{8,16}_l4 | |
| Just used to work around a bug in an old libavcodec encoder version. | |
| Don't optimize them. | |
| add_bytes/diff_bytes | |
| For huffyuv only, optimize if you want a faster ffhuffyuv codec. | |
| get_pixels / diff_pixels | |
| Used for encoding, easy. | |
| clear_blocks | |
| easiest to optimize | |
| gmc | |
| Used for MPEG-4 gmc. | |
| Optimizing this should have a significant effect on the gmc decoding | |
| speed. | |
| gmc1 | |
| Used for chroma blocks in MPEG-4 gmc with 1 warp point | |
| (there are 4 luma & 2 chroma blocks per macroblock, so | |
| only 1/3 of the gmc blocks use this, the other 2/3 | |
| use the normal put_pixel* code, but only if there is | |
| just 1 warp point). | |
| Note: DivX5 gmc always uses just 1 warp point. | |
| pix_sum | |
| Used for encoding. | |
| hadamard8_diff / sse / sad == pix_norm1 / dct_sad / quant_psnr / rd / bit | |
| Specific compare functions used in encoding, it depends upon the | |
| command line switches which of these are used. | |
| Don't waste your time with dct_sad & quant_psnr, they aren't | |
| really useful. | |
| put_pixels_clamped / add_pixels_clamped | |
| Used for en/decoding in the IDCT, easy. | |
| Note, some optimized IDCTs have the add/put clamped code included and | |
| then put_pixels_clamped / add_pixels_clamped will be unused. | |
| idct/fdct | |
| idct (encoding & decoding) | |
| fdct (encoding) | |
| difficult to optimize | |
| dct_quantize_trellis | |
| Used for encoding with trellis quantization. | |
| difficult to optimize | |
| dct_quantize | |
| Used for encoding. | |
| dct_unquantize_mpeg1 | |
| Used in MPEG-1 en/decoding. | |
| dct_unquantize_mpeg2 | |
| Used in MPEG-2 en/decoding. | |
| dct_unquantize_h263 | |
| Used in MPEG-4/H.263 en/decoding. | |
| Alignment: | |
| Some instructions on some architectures have strict alignment restrictions, | |
| for example most SSE/SSE2 instructions on x86. | |
| The minimum guaranteed alignment is written in the .h files, for example: | |
| void (*put_pixels_clamped)(const int16_t *block/*align 16*/, uint8_t *pixels/*align 8*/, ptrdiff_t stride); | |
| General Tips: | |
| ------------- | |
| Use asm loops like: | |
| __asm__( | |
| "1: .... | |
| ... | |
| "jump_instruction .... | |
| Do not use C loops: | |
| do{ | |
| __asm__( | |
| ... | |
| }while() | |
| For x86, mark registers that are clobbered in your asm. This means both | |
| general x86 registers (e.g. eax) as well as XMM registers. This last one is | |
| particularly important on Win64, where xmm6-15 are callee-save, and not | |
| restoring their contents leads to undefined results. In external asm, | |
| you do this by using: | |
| cglobal function_name, num_args, num_regs, num_xmm_regs | |
| In inline asm, you specify clobbered registers at the end of your asm: | |
| __asm__(".." ::: "%eax"). | |
| If gcc is not set to support sse (-msse) it will not accept xmm registers | |
| in the clobber list. For that we use two macros to declare the clobbers. | |
| XMM_CLOBBERS should be used when there are other clobbers, for example: | |
| __asm__(".." ::: XMM_CLOBBERS("xmm0",) "eax"); | |
| and XMM_CLOBBERS_ONLY should be used when the only clobbers are xmm registers: | |
| __asm__(".." :: XMM_CLOBBERS_ONLY("xmm0")); | |
| Do not expect a compiler to maintain values in your registers between separate | |
| (inline) asm code blocks. It is not required to. For example, this is bad: | |
| __asm__("movdqa %0, %%xmm7" : src); | |
| /* do something */ | |
| __asm__("movdqa %%xmm7, %1" : dst); | |
| - first of all, you're assuming that the compiler will not use xmm7 in | |
| between the two asm blocks. It probably won't when you test it, but it's | |
| a poor assumption that will break at some point for some --cpu compiler flag | |
| - secondly, you didn't mark xmm7 as clobbered. If you did, the compiler would | |
| have restored the original value of xmm7 after the first asm block, thus | |
| rendering the combination of the two blocks of code invalid | |
| Code that depends on data in registries being untouched, should be written as | |
| a single __asm__() statement. Ideally, a single function contains only one | |
| __asm__() block. | |
| Use external asm (nasm/yasm) or inline asm (__asm__()), do not use intrinsics. | |
| The latter requires a good optimizing compiler which gcc is not. | |
| When debugging a x86 external asm compilation issue, if lost in the macro | |
| expansions, add DBG=1 to your make command-line: the input file will be | |
| preprocessed, stripped of the debug/empty lines, then compiled, showing the | |
| actual lines causing issues. | |
| Inline asm vs. external asm | |
| --------------------------- | |
| Both inline asm (__asm__("..") in a .c file, handled by a compiler such as gcc) | |
| and external asm (.s or .asm files, handled by an assembler such as nasm/yasm) | |
| are accepted in FFmpeg. Which one to use differs per specific case. | |
| - if your code is intended to be inlined in a C function, inline asm is always | |
| better, because external asm cannot be inlined | |
| - if your code calls external functions, external asm is always better | |
| - if your code takes huge and complex structs as function arguments (e.g. | |
| MpegEncContext; note that this is not ideal and is discouraged if there | |
| are alternatives), then inline asm is always better, because predicting | |
| member offsets in complex structs is almost impossible. It's safest to let | |
| the compiler take care of that | |
| - in many cases, both can be used and it just depends on the preference of the | |
| person writing the asm. For new asm, the choice is up to you. For existing | |
| asm, you'll likely want to maintain whatever form it is currently in unless | |
| there is a good reason to change it. | |
| - if, for some reason, you believe that a particular chunk of existing external | |
| asm could be improved upon further if written in inline asm (or the other | |
| way around), then please make the move from external asm <-> inline asm a | |
| separate patch before your patches that actually improve the asm. | |
| Links: | |
| ====== | |
| http://www.aggregate.org/MAGIC/ | |
| x86-specific: | |
| ------------- | |
| http://developer.intel.com/design/pentium4/manuals/248966.htm | |
| The IA-32 Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual, Volume 2: | |
| Instruction Set Reference | |
| http://developer.intel.com/design/pentium4/manuals/245471.htm | |
| http://www.agner.org/assem/ | |
| AMD Athlon Processor x86 Code Optimization Guide: | |
| http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/22007.pdf | |
| ARM-specific: | |
| ------------- | |
| ARM Architecture Reference Manual (up to ARMv5TE): | |
| http://www.arm.com/community/university/eulaarmarm.html | |
| Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Architecture: | |
| http://www.arm.com/pdfs/aapcs.pdf | |
| Optimization guide for ARM9E (used in Nokia 770 Internet Tablet): | |
| http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0240b/DDI0240A.pdf | |
| Optimization guide for ARM11 (used in Nokia N800 Internet Tablet): | |
| http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0211j/DDI0211J_arm1136_r1p5_trm.pdf | |
| Optimization guide for Intel XScale (used in Sharp Zaurus PDA): | |
| http://download.intel.com/design/intelxscale/27347302.pdf | |
| Intel Wireless MMX 2 Coprocessor: Programmers Reference Manual | |
| http://download.intel.com/design/intelxscale/31451001.pdf | |
| PowerPC-specific: | |
| ----------------- | |
| PowerPC32/AltiVec PIM: | |
| www.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/ref_manual/ALTIVECPEM.pdf | |
| PowerPC32/AltiVec PEM: | |
| www.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/ref_manual/ALTIVECPIM.pdf | |
| CELL/SPU: | |
| http://www-01.ibm.com/chips/techlib/techlib.nsf/techdocs/30B3520C93F437AB87257060006FFE5E/$file/Language_Extensions_for_CBEA_2.4.pdf | |
| http://www-01.ibm.com/chips/techlib/techlib.nsf/techdocs/9F820A5FFA3ECE8C8725716A0062585F/$file/CBE_Handbook_v1.1_24APR2007_pub.pdf | |
| RISC-V-specific: | |
| ---------------- | |
| The RISC-V Instruction Set Manual, Volume 1, Unprivileged ISA: | |
| https://riscv.org/technical/specifications/ | |
| GCC asm links: | |
| -------------- | |
| official doc but quite ugly | |
| http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html | |
| a bit old (note "+" is valid for input-output, even though the next disagrees) | |
| http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~clc5q/gcc-inline-asm.pdf |