| Power-On-Self-Test support in U-Boot | |
| ------------------------------------ | |
| This project is to support Power-On-Self-Test (POST) in U-Boot. | |
| 1. High-level requirements | |
| The key requirements for this project are as follows: | |
| 1) The project shall develop a flexible framework for implementing | |
| and running Power-On-Self-Test in U-Boot. This framework shall | |
| possess the following features: | |
| o) Extensibility | |
| The framework shall allow adding/removing/replacing POST tests. | |
| Also, standalone POST tests shall be supported. | |
| o) Configurability | |
| The framework shall allow run-time configuration of the lists | |
| of tests running on normal/power-fail booting. | |
| o) Controllability | |
| The framework shall support manual running of the POST tests. | |
| 2) The results of tests shall be saved so that it will be possible to | |
| retrieve them from Linux. | |
| 3) The following POST tests shall be developed for MPC823E-based | |
| boards: | |
| o) CPU test | |
| o) Cache test | |
| o) Memory test | |
| o) Ethernet test | |
| o) Serial channels test | |
| o) Watchdog timer test | |
| o) RTC test | |
| o) I2C test | |
| o) SPI test | |
| o) USB test | |
| 4) The LWMON board shall be used for reference. | |
| 2. Design | |
| This section details the key points of the design for the project. | |
| The whole project can be divided into two independent tasks: | |
| enhancing U-Boot/Linux to provide a common framework for running POST | |
| tests and developing such tests for particular hardware. | |
| 2.1. Hardware-independent POST layer | |
| A new optional module will be added to U-Boot, which will run POST | |
| tests and collect their results at boot time. Also, U-Boot will | |
| support running POST tests manually at any time by executing a | |
| special command from the system console. | |
| The list of available POST tests will be configured at U-Boot build | |
| time. The POST layer will allow the developer to add any custom POST | |
| tests. All POST tests will be divided into the following groups: | |
| 1) Tests running on power-on booting only | |
| This group will contain those tests that run only once on | |
| power-on reset (e.g. watchdog test) | |
| 2) Tests running on normal booting only | |
| This group will contain those tests that do not take much | |
| time and can be run on the regular basis (e.g. CPU test) | |
| 3) Tests running in special "slow test mode" only | |
| This group will contain POST tests that consume much time | |
| and cannot be run regularly (e.g. strong memory test, I2C test) | |
| 4) Manually executed tests | |
| This group will contain those tests that can be run manually. | |
| If necessary, some tests may belong to several groups simultaneously. | |
| For example, SDRAM test may run in both normal and "slow test" mode. | |
| In normal mode, SDRAM test may perform a fast superficial memory test | |
| only, while running in slow test mode it may perform a full memory | |
| check-up. | |
| Also, all tests will be discriminated by the moment they run at. | |
| Specifically, the following groups will be singled out: | |
| 1) Tests running before relocating to RAM | |
| These tests will run immediately after initializing RAM | |
| as to enable modifying it without taking care of its | |
| contents. Basically, this group will contain memory tests | |
| only. | |
| 2) Tests running after relocating to RAM | |
| These tests will run immediately before entering the main | |
| loop as to guarantee full hardware initialization. | |
| The POST layer will also distinguish a special group of tests that | |
| may cause system rebooting (e.g. watchdog test). For such tests, the | |
| layer will automatically detect rebooting and will notify the test | |
| about it. | |
| 2.1.1. POST layer interfaces | |
| This section details the interfaces between the POST layer and the | |
| rest of U-Boot. | |
| The following flags will be defined: | |
| #define POST_POWERON 0x01 /* test runs on power-on booting */ | |
| #define POST_NORMAL 0x02 /* test runs on normal booting */ | |
| #define POST_SLOWTEST 0x04 /* test is slow, enabled by key press */ | |
| #define POST_POWERTEST 0x08 /* test runs after watchdog reset */ | |
| #define POST_ROM 0x100 /* test runs in ROM */ | |
| #define POST_RAM 0x200 /* test runs in RAM */ | |
| #define POST_MANUAL 0x400 /* test can be executed manually */ | |
| #define POST_REBOOT 0x800 /* test may cause rebooting */ | |
| #define POST_PREREL 0x1000 /* test runs before relocation */ | |
| The POST layer will export the following interface routines: | |
| o) int post_run(bd_t *bd, char *name, int flags); | |
| This routine will run the test (or the group of tests) specified | |
| by the name and flag arguments. More specifically, if the name | |
| argument is not NULL, the test with this name will be performed, | |
| otherwise all tests running in ROM/RAM (depending on the flag | |
| argument) will be executed. This routine will be called at least | |
| twice with name set to NULL, once from board_init_f() and once | |
| from board_init_r(). The flags argument will also specify the | |
| mode the test is executed in (power-on, normal, power-fail, | |
| manual). | |
| o) void post_reloc(ulong offset); | |
| This routine will be called from board_init_r() and will | |
| relocate the POST test table. | |
| o) int post_info(char *name); | |
| This routine will print the list of all POST tests that can be | |
| executed manually if name is NULL, and the description of a | |
| particular test if name is not NULL. | |
| o) int post_log(char *format, ...); | |
| This routine will be called from POST tests to log their | |
| results. Basically, this routine will print the results to | |
| stderr. The format of the arguments and the return value | |
| will be identical to the printf() routine. | |
| Also, the following board-specific routines will be called from the | |
| U-Boot common code: | |
| o) int board_power_mode(void) | |
| This routine will return the mode the system is running in | |
| (POST_POWERON, POST_NORMAL or POST_SHUTDOWN). | |
| o) void board_poweroff(void) | |
| This routine will turn off the power supply of the board. It | |
| will be called on power-fail booting after running all POST | |
| tests. | |
| o) int post_hotkeys_pressed(gd_t *gd) | |
| This routine will scan the keyboard to detect if a magic key | |
| combination has been pressed, or otherwise detect if the | |
| power-on long-running tests shall be executed or not ("normal" | |
| versus "slow" test mode). | |
| The list of available POST tests be kept in the post_tests array | |
| filled at U-Boot build time. The format of entry in this array will | |
| be as follows: | |
| struct post_test { | |
| char *name; | |
| char *cmd; | |
| char *desc; | |
| int flags; | |
| int (*test)(bd_t *bd, int flags); | |
| }; | |
| o) name | |
| This field will contain a short name of the test, which will be | |
| used in logs and on listing POST tests (e.g. CPU test). | |
| o) cmd | |
| This field will keep a name for identifying the test on manual | |
| testing (e.g. cpu). For more information, refer to section | |
| "Command line interface". | |
| o) desc | |
| This field will contain a detailed description of the test, | |
| which will be printed on user request. For more information, see | |
| section "Command line interface". | |
| o) flags | |
| This field will contain a combination of the bit flags described | |
| above, which will specify the mode the test is running in | |
| (power-on, normal, power-fail or manual mode), the moment it | |
| should be run at (before or after relocating to RAM), whether it | |
| can cause system rebooting or not. | |
| o) test | |
| This field will contain a pointer to the routine that will | |
| perform the test, which will take 2 arguments. The first | |
| argument will be a pointer to the board info structure, while | |
| the second will be a combination of bit flags specifying the | |
| mode the test is running in (POST_POWERON, POST_NORMAL, | |
| POST_SLOWTEST, POST_MANUAL) and whether the last execution of | |
| the test caused system rebooting (POST_REBOOT). The routine will | |
| return 0 on successful execution of the test, and 1 if the test | |
| failed. | |
| The lists of the POST tests that should be run at power-on/normal/ | |
| power-fail booting will be kept in the environment. Namely, the | |
| following environment variables will be used: post_poweron, | |
| powet_normal, post_slowtest. | |
| 2.1.2. Test results | |
| The results of tests will be collected by the POST layer. The POST | |
| log will have the following format: | |
| ... | |
| -------------------------------------------- | |
| START <name> | |
| <test-specific output> | |
| [PASSED|FAILED] | |
| -------------------------------------------- | |
| ... | |
| Basically, the results of tests will be printed to stderr. This | |
| feature may be enhanced in future to spool the log to a serial line, | |
| save it in non-volatile RAM (NVRAM), transfer it to a dedicated | |
| storage server and etc. | |
| 2.1.3. Integration issues | |
| All POST-related code will be #ifdef'ed with the CONFIG_POST macro. | |
| This macro will be defined in the config_<board>.h file for those | |
| boards that need POST. The CONFIG_POST macro will contain the list of | |
| POST tests for the board. The macro will have the format of array | |
| composed of post_test structures: | |
| #define CONFIG_POST \ | |
| { | |
| "On-board peripherals test", "board", \ | |
| " This test performs full check-up of the " \ | |
| "on-board hardware.", \ | |
| POST_RAM | POST_SLOWTEST, \ | |
| &board_post_test \ | |
| } | |
| A new file, post.h, will be created in the include/ directory. This | |
| file will contain common POST declarations and will define a set of | |
| macros that will be reused for defining CONFIG_POST. As an example, | |
| the following macro may be defined: | |
| #define POST_CACHE \ | |
| { | |
| "Cache test", "cache", \ | |
| " This test verifies the CPU cache operation.", \ | |
| POST_RAM | POST_NORMAL, \ | |
| &cache_post_test \ | |
| } | |
| A new subdirectory will be created in the U-Boot root directory. It | |
| will contain the source code of the POST layer and most of POST | |
| tests. Each POST test in this directory will be placed into a | |
| separate file (it will be needed for building standalone tests). Some | |
| POST tests (mainly those for testing peripheral devices) will be | |
| located in the source files of the drivers for those devices. This | |
| way will be used only if the test subtantially uses the driver. | |
| 2.1.4. Standalone tests | |
| The POST framework will allow to develop and run standalone tests. A | |
| user-space library will be developed to provide the POST interface | |
| functions to standalone tests. | |
| 2.1.5. Command line interface | |
| A new command, diag, will be added to U-Boot. This command will be | |
| used for listing all available hardware tests, getting detailed | |
| descriptions of them and running these tests. | |
| More specifically, being run without any arguments, this command will | |
| print the list of all available hardware tests: | |
| => diag | |
| Available hardware tests: | |
| cache - cache test | |
| cpu - CPU test | |
| enet - SCC/FCC ethernet test | |
| Use 'diag [<test1> [<test2>]] ... ' to get more info. | |
| Use 'diag run [<test1> [<test2>]] ... ' to run tests. | |
| => | |
| If the first argument to the diag command is not 'run', detailed | |
| descriptions of the specified tests will be printed: | |
| => diag cpu cache | |
| cpu - CPU test | |
| This test verifies the arithmetic logic unit of CPU. | |
| cache - cache test | |
| This test verifies the CPU cache operation. | |
| => | |
| If the first argument to diag is 'run', the specified tests will be | |
| executed. If no tests are specified, all available tests will be | |
| executed. | |
| It will be prohibited to execute tests running in ROM manually. The | |
| 'diag' command will not display such tests and/or run them. | |
| 2.1.6. Power failure handling | |
| The Linux kernel will be modified to detect power failures and | |
| automatically reboot the system in such cases. It will be assumed | |
| that the power failure causes a system interrupt. | |
| To perform correct system shutdown, the kernel will register a | |
| handler of the power-fail IRQ on booting. Being called, the handler | |
| will run /sbin/reboot using the call_usermodehelper() routine. | |
| /sbin/reboot will automatically bring the system down in a secure | |
| way. This feature will be configured in/out from the kernel | |
| configuration file. | |
| The POST layer of U-Boot will check whether the system runs in | |
| power-fail mode. If it does, the system will be powered off after | |
| executing all hardware tests. | |
| 2.1.7. Hazardous tests | |
| Some tests may cause system rebooting during their execution. For | |
| some tests, this will indicate a failure, while for the Watchdog | |
| test, this means successful operation of the timer. | |
| In order to support such tests, the following scheme will be | |
| implemented. All the tests that may cause system rebooting will have | |
| the POST_REBOOT bit flag set in the flag field of the correspondent | |
| post_test structure. Before starting tests marked with this bit flag, | |
| the POST layer will store an identification number of the test in a | |
| location in IMMR. On booting, the POST layer will check the value of | |
| this variable and if it is set will skip over the tests preceding the | |
| failed one. On second execution of the failed test, the POST_REBOOT | |
| bit flag will be set in the flag argument to the test routine. This | |
| will allow to detect system rebooting on the previous iteration. For | |
| example, the watchdog timer test may have the following | |
| declaration/body: | |
| ... | |
| #define POST_WATCHDOG \ | |
| { | |
| "Watchdog timer test", "watchdog", \ | |
| " This test checks the watchdog timer.", \ | |
| POST_RAM | POST_POWERON | POST_REBOOT, \ | |
| &watchdog_post_test \ | |
| } | |
| ... | |
| ... | |
| int watchdog_post_test(bd_t *bd, int flags) | |
| { | |
| unsigned long start_time; | |
| if (flags & POST_REBOOT) { | |
| /* Test passed */ | |
| return 0; | |
| } else { | |
| /* disable interrupts */ | |
| disable_interrupts(); | |
| /* 10-second delay */ | |
| ... | |
| /* if we've reached this, the watchdog timer does not work */ | |
| enable_interrupts(); | |
| return 1; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| ... | |
| 2.2. Hardware-specific details | |
| This project will also develop a set of POST tests for MPC8xx- based | |
| systems. This section provides technical details of how it will be | |
| done. | |
| 2.2.1. Generic PPC tests | |
| The following generic POST tests will be developed: | |
| o) CPU test | |
| This test will check the arithmetic logic unit (ALU) of CPU. The | |
| test will take several milliseconds and will run on normal | |
| booting. | |
| o) Cache test | |
| This test will verify the CPU cache (L1 cache). The test will | |
| run on normal booting. | |
| o) Memory test | |
| This test will examine RAM and check it for errors. The test | |
| will always run on booting. On normal booting, only a limited | |
| amount of RAM will be checked. On power-fail booting a fool | |
| memory check-up will be performed. | |
| 2.2.1.1. CPU test | |
| This test will verify the following ALU instructions: | |
| o) Condition register istructions | |
| This group will contain: mtcrf, mfcr, mcrxr, crand, crandc, | |
| cror, crorc, crxor, crnand, crnor, creqv, mcrf. | |
| The mtcrf/mfcr instructions will be tested by loading different | |
| values into the condition register (mtcrf), moving its value to | |
| a general-purpose register (mfcr) and comparing this value with | |
| the expected one. The mcrxr instruction will be tested by | |
| loading a fixed value into the XER register (mtspr), moving XER | |
| value to the condition register (mcrxr), moving it to a | |
| general-purpose register (mfcr) and comparing the value of this | |
| register with the expected one. The rest of instructions will be | |
| tested by loading a fixed value into the condition register | |
| (mtcrf), executing each instruction several times to modify all | |
| 4-bit condition fields, moving the value of the conditional | |
| register to a general-purpose register (mfcr) and comparing it | |
| with the expected one. | |
| o) Integer compare instructions | |
| This group will contain: cmp, cmpi, cmpl, cmpli. | |
| To verify these instructions the test will run them with | |
| different combinations of operands, read the condition register | |
| value and compare it with the expected one. More specifically, | |
| the test will contain a pre-built table containing the | |
| description of each test case: the instruction, the values of | |
| the operands, the condition field to save the result in and the | |
| expected result. | |
| o) Arithmetic instructions | |
| This group will contain: add, addc, adde, addme, addze, subf, | |
| subfc, subfe, subme, subze, mullw, mulhw, mulhwu, divw, divwu, | |
| extsb, extsh. | |
| The test will contain a pre-built table of instructions, | |
| operands, expected results and expected states of the condition | |
| register. For each table entry, the test will cyclically use | |
| different sets of operand registers and result registers. For | |
| example, for instructions that use 3 registers on the first | |
| iteration r0/r1 will be used as operands and r2 for result. On | |
| the second iteration, r1/r2 will be used as operands and r3 as | |
| for result and so on. This will enable to verify all | |
| general-purpose registers. | |
| o) Logic instructions | |
| This group will contain: and, andc, andi, andis, or, orc, ori, | |
| oris, xor, xori, xoris, nand, nor, neg, eqv, cntlzw. | |
| The test scheme will be identical to that from the previous | |
| point. | |
| o) Shift instructions | |
| This group will contain: slw, srw, sraw, srawi, rlwinm, rlwnm, | |
| rlwimi | |
| The test scheme will be identical to that from the previous | |
| point. | |
| o) Branch instructions | |
| This group will contain: b, bl, bc. | |
| The first 2 instructions (b, bl) will be verified by jumping to | |
| a fixed address and checking whether control was transfered to | |
| that very point. For the bl instruction the value of the link | |
| register will be checked as well (using mfspr). To verify the bc | |
| instruction various combinations of the BI/BO fields, the CTR | |
| and the condition register values will be checked. The list of | |
| such combinations will be pre-built and linked in U-Boot at | |
| build time. | |
| o) Load/store instructions | |
| This group will contain: lbz(x)(u), lhz(x)(u), lha(x)(u), | |
| lwz(x)(u), stb(x)(u), sth(x)(u), stw(x)(u). | |
| All operations will be performed on a 16-byte array. The array | |
| will be 4-byte aligned. The base register will point to offset | |
| 8. The immediate offset (index register) will range in [-8 ... | |
| +7]. The test cases will be composed so that they will not cause | |
| alignment exceptions. The test will contain a pre-built table | |
| describing all test cases. For store instructions, the table | |
| entry will contain: the instruction opcode, the value of the | |
| index register and the value of the source register. After | |
| executing the instruction, the test will verify the contents of | |
| the array and the value of the base register (it must change for | |
| "store with update" instructions). For load instructions, the | |
| table entry will contain: the instruction opcode, the array | |
| contents, the value of the index register and the expected value | |
| of the destination register. After executing the instruction, | |
| the test will verify the value of the destination register and | |
| the value of the base register (it must change for "load with | |
| update" instructions). | |
| o) Load/store multiple/string instructions | |
| The CPU test will run in RAM in order to allow run-time modification | |
| of the code to reduce the memory footprint. | |
| 2.2.1.2 Special-Purpose Registers Tests | |
| TBD. | |
| 2.2.1.3. Cache test | |
| To verify the data cache operation the following test scenarios will | |
| be used: | |
| 1) Basic test #1 | |
| - turn on the data cache | |
| - switch the data cache to write-back or write-through mode | |
| - invalidate the data cache | |
| - write the negative pattern to a cached area | |
| - read the area | |
| The negative pattern must be read at the last step | |
| 2) Basic test #2 | |
| - turn on the data cache | |
| - switch the data cache to write-back or write-through mode | |
| - invalidate the data cache | |
| - write the zero pattern to a cached area | |
| - turn off the data cache | |
| - write the negative pattern to the area | |
| - turn on the data cache | |
| - read the area | |
| The negative pattern must be read at the last step | |
| 3) Write-through mode test | |
| - turn on the data cache | |
| - switch the data cache to write-through mode | |
| - invalidate the data cache | |
| - write the zero pattern to a cached area | |
| - flush the data cache | |
| - write the negative pattern to the area | |
| - turn off the data cache | |
| - read the area | |
| The negative pattern must be read at the last step | |
| 4) Write-back mode test | |
| - turn on the data cache | |
| - switch the data cache to write-back mode | |
| - invalidate the data cache | |
| - write the negative pattern to a cached area | |
| - flush the data cache | |
| - write the zero pattern to the area | |
| - invalidate the data cache | |
| - read the area | |
| The negative pattern must be read at the last step | |
| To verify the instruction cache operation the following test | |
| scenarios will be used: | |
| 1) Basic test #1 | |
| - turn on the instruction cache | |
| - unlock the entire instruction cache | |
| - invalidate the instruction cache | |
| - lock a branch instruction in the instruction cache | |
| - replace the branch instruction with "nop" | |
| - jump to the branch instruction | |
| - check that the branch instruction was executed | |
| 2) Basic test #2 | |
| - turn on the instruction cache | |
| - unlock the entire instruction cache | |
| - invalidate the instruction cache | |
| - jump to a branch instruction | |
| - check that the branch instruction was executed | |
| - replace the branch instruction with "nop" | |
| - invalidate the instruction cache | |
| - jump to the branch instruction | |
| - check that the "nop" instruction was executed | |
| The CPU test will run in RAM in order to allow run-time modification | |
| of the code. | |
| 2.2.1.4. Memory test | |
| The memory test will verify RAM using sequential writes and reads | |
| to/from RAM. Specifically, there will be several test cases that will | |
| use different patterns to verify RAM. Each test case will first fill | |
| a region of RAM with one pattern and then read the region back and | |
| compare its contents with the pattern. The following patterns will be | |
| used: | |
| 1) zero pattern (0x00000000) | |
| 2) negative pattern (0xffffffff) | |
| 3) checkerboard pattern (0x55555555, 0xaaaaaaaa) | |
| 4) bit-flip pattern ((1 << (offset % 32)), ~(1 << (offset % 32))) | |
| 5) address pattern (offset, ~offset) | |
| Patterns #1, #2 will help to find unstable bits. Patterns #3, #4 will | |
| be used to detect adherent bits, i.e. bits whose state may randomly | |
| change if adjacent bits are modified. The last pattern will be used | |
| to detect far-located errors, i.e. situations when writing to one | |
| location modifies an area located far from it. Also, usage of the | |
| last pattern will help to detect memory controller misconfigurations | |
| when RAM represents a cyclically repeated portion of a smaller size. | |
| Being run in normal mode, the test will verify only small 4Kb regions | |
| of RAM around each 1Mb boundary. For example, for 64Mb RAM the | |
| following areas will be verified: 0x00000000-0x00000800, | |
| 0x000ff800-0x00100800, 0x001ff800-0x00200800, ..., 0x03fff800- | |
| 0x04000000. If the test is run in power-fail mode, it will verify the | |
| whole RAM. | |
| The memory test will run in ROM before relocating U-Boot to RAM in | |
| order to allow RAM modification without saving its contents. | |
| 2.2.2. Common tests | |
| This section describes tests that are not based on any hardware | |
| peculiarities and use common U-Boot interfaces only. These tests do | |
| not need any modifications for porting them to another board/CPU. | |
| 2.2.2.1. I2C test | |
| For verifying the I2C bus, a full I2C bus scanning will be performed | |
| using the i2c_probe() routine. If any I2C device is found, the test | |
| will be considered as passed, otherwise failed. This particular way | |
| will be used because it provides the most common method of testing. | |
| For example, using the internal loopback mode of the CPM I2C | |
| controller for testing would not work on boards where the software | |
| I2C driver (also known as bit-banged driver) is used. | |
| 2.2.2.2. Watchdog timer test | |
| To test the watchdog timer the scheme mentioned above (refer to | |
| section "Hazardous tests") will be used. Namely, this test will be | |
| marked with the POST_REBOOT bit flag. On the first iteration, the | |
| test routine will make a 10-second delay. If the system does not | |
| reboot during this delay, the watchdog timer is not operational and | |
| the test fails. If the system reboots, on the second iteration the | |
| POST_REBOOT bit will be set in the flag argument to the test routine. | |
| The test routine will check this bit and report a success if it is | |
| set. | |
| 2.2.2.3. RTC test | |
| The RTC test will use the rtc_get()/rtc_set() routines. The following | |
| features will be verified: | |
| o) Time uniformity | |
| This will be verified by reading RTC in polling within a short | |
| period of time (5-10 seconds). | |
| o) Passing month boundaries | |
| This will be checked by setting RTC to a second before a month | |
| boundary and reading it after its passing the boundary. The test | |
| will be performed for both leap- and nonleap-years. | |
| 2.2.3. MPC8xx peripherals tests | |
| This project will develop a set of tests verifying the peripheral | |
| units of MPC8xx processors. Namely, the following controllers of the | |
| MPC8xx communication processor module (CPM) will be tested: | |
| o) Serial Management Controllers (SMC) | |
| o) Serial Communication Controllers (SCC) | |
| 2.2.3.1. Ethernet tests (SCC) | |
| The internal (local) loopback mode will be used to test SCC. To do | |
| that the controllers will be configured accordingly and several | |
| packets will be transmitted. These tests may be enhanced in future to | |
| use external loopback for testing. That will need appropriate | |
| reconfiguration of the physical interface chip. | |
| The test routines for the SCC ethernet tests will be located in | |
| cpu/mpc8xx/scc.c. | |
| 2.2.3.2. UART tests (SMC/SCC) | |
| To perform these tests the internal (local) loopback mode will be | |
| used. The SMC/SCC controllers will be configured to connect the | |
| transmitter output to the receiver input. After that, several bytes | |
| will be transmitted. These tests may be enhanced to make to perform | |
| "external" loopback test using a loopback cable. In this case, the | |
| test will be executed manually. | |
| The test routine for the SMC/SCC UART tests will be located in | |
| cpu/mpc8xx/serial.c. | |
| 2.2.3.3. USB test | |
| TBD | |
| 2.2.3.4. SPI test | |
| TBD |